On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:32:32 +0300, mumumčik zergatronas wrote: > cituoju: > > > "Historically, plasma had a technological and cost advantage in the big > screens over LCD. Early on, plasma makers showed that their sets run on > less energy than liquid-crystal-display TVs. But LCD makers are making > bigger sets—and that might have swayed Pioneer to bail. No doubt the > economic downturn, the strong yen, and this year's forecast for > single-digit growth in TV sales (a mere 5% rise to 14.6 million units, > according to DisplaySearch) made the decision easier. " > > > Plasmos pristabdomos DEL KRIZES ir del PAKLAUSOS nebuvimo, nes viska > uzima LEVESNI LCD.. LCD nera levesni, tiesiog del technologiju progreso plazmos praranda tureta pranasuma ir tuo paciu prasme egzistuoti. > Ne pirmas atvejis istorijoje, kai pazangesne technologija nueina i > seseli, nisa del kitu, net ir prastesniu produktu masiskumo ir pigumo > (Betacam vs VHS pvz..) Plazma nera pazangesne technologija, tiesiog jos trukumai netrukde didinti istrizaines. -- In teh beginnin Ceiling Cat maded teh skiez An da Urfs, but he did not eated dem.