O aš iš salės išėjau tik su Vau dėl pabaigos. Na tipo intriga. Visa kita - idėja gerai.. bet laaaabai jau tiesiškas ir nuspėjamas filmas su nuliu (t.y. minus vienu) mindfuck'u. Second time no see. "Kaksht" <kaksht@cianetikrasmuilas.com> wrote in message news:i4toui$j14$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > Yeap, tokius filmus reikia salej ziuret :) Inception varysiu antra syki > treciadieni per jomajo ziuret, nes tikrai verta. > > -- > Honda Civic '00 EK3 1.5 Vtec-E > > "Norw" <meilo@nera.lt> wrote in message > news:i4sb5a$urt$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> Pasiseke, kad salej matei :) Vizualiai labai grazus tas Watchmen. >> >> Itariu reikia varyt i kina paziuret Inception kol dar rodo. The Dark >> Knight >> tai nerealiai patiko. Itariu Nolanas ir cia pasistenge. >> >> "Kaksht" <ne_mano_mail@xxx.com> parašė naujienų >> news:i4s7o4$sl7$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> Na Southland ir Watchmen tai lygintini tik is to kad ale apokaliptiniai >>> filmai, ar bent veda prie to. O siaip Watchmen man asmeniskai vienas >>> geriausiu filmu ever, sakyciau isejau is sales paveiktas taip pat kaip >>> ir >>> po Inception (su vau efektu) :) >>> >>> "Norw" <meilo@nera.lt> wrote in message >>> news:i4pk2g$net$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>> Perziurejau. Galiu pasakyt tas filmas yra vienas didelis "mindfuck" su >>>> buriu >>>> zvaigzdziu ir pigiais efektais. >>>> Po Donnie Darko galvojau, kad rezisierius yra jaunasis genijus. Po >>>> Southland >>>> Tales ir The Box manau, kad rezisierius tiesiog toliau saudo tais >>>> paciais >>>> soviniais, tik pastarieji du nelabai sekmingi. Kurybingas tas Richard >>>> Kelly, bet deja per daug druskos sugadina patiekala. >>>> >>>> Kas nemate siulyciau geriau paziureti Watchmen >>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0409459/ >>>> Panasus "alternatyvus" pasaulis, istorija taip pat pasakojama vieno >>>> veikeju, >>>> persidenge siuzetai ir vizualiai idomus filmas. Ir sakyciau zymiai >>>> idomesnis >>>> ir daug geriau pavykes nei Southland Tales. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "Kaksht" <kaksht@cianetikrasmuilas.com> parašė naujienų >>>> news:i4jl34$sav$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0405336/ >>>>> >>>>> Kazkaip prisiminiau sita sena filma ir nutariau priminti tiem kas >>>>> nemate >>>>> :) Siaip sunkus filmas ir tikrai nekiekvienam, daug kas nesupras, daug >>>>> kam >>>>> nepatiks, bet kam patiks - tam labai patiks. Man asmeniskai labai >>>>> patiko, >>>>> super istorija, super nuotaika perteikta filme, ir visi aktoriai labai >>>>> gerai vaidina. >>>>> >>>>> Rekomenduoju! >>>>> >>>>> vienas komentaras is youtube >>>>> "This movie was very under rated. It is a fantastic story which makes >>>>> you >>>>> think about you and your life style. The style of the film is also >>>>> individual which I love." >>>>> >>>>> Papaste'insiu viena is review is imdb: >>>>> This is the way the world ends. Not with a whimper, but with a bang. >>>>> >>>>> This is a film about all of the seemingly random events that lead up >>>>> to >>>>> the end of the world. And it's also a comedy. >>>>> >>>>> That says it all right there, doesn't it? >>>>> >>>>> When this film ended, I ran to tell every one I could find about it. >>>>> The >>>>> odd thing I found about it was that I ended nearly every one of these >>>>> conversations with the following: >>>>> >>>>> "It was amazing, but don't see it. You won't like it." >>>>> >>>>> It's strange to hope that a film I feel so passionately about should >>>>> not >>>>> be seen by the very people I want to discuss it with. However, that's >>>>> exactly the way I feel here. This film is not for everybody; in fact, >>>>> there are only a precious few out of all of the people who see it that >>>>> will even tolerate its existence. But you know what? That really isn't >>>>> important. >>>>> >>>>> Art is subjective, and no matter how many times I bother to explain a >>>>> difficult concept to somebody who hated this film, I realize that it >>>>> will >>>>> never work long before the conversation ends. The problem is that >>>>> these >>>>> difficult concepts are actually very simplistic: Richard Kelly had >>>>> Dwayne >>>>> Johnson spoof the stereotypical, apocalyptic action-hero throughout >>>>> the >>>>> film. This included over-dramatic readings of his lines, delayed >>>>> reactions >>>>> and odd vocal dynamics. >>>>> >>>>> What? You say that it wasn't intentional, and that it was just >>>>> Johnson's >>>>> poor acting skills? >>>>> >>>>> This is where the small-minded fail to grasp the most simplistic of >>>>> concepts. The great analytical film student will analyze a crooked >>>>> frame >>>>> and declare the brilliance of its intent; they will say that this >>>>> intentional error supports the themes of the piece. So why does the >>>>> same >>>>> not go for Southland Tales? >>>>> >>>>> Each one of these already-marked actors has broken out of their shells >>>>> for >>>>> this movie. The fact that everybody stereotypes them attests to >>>>> Kelly's >>>>> genius in assigning them the roles; however, it also proves how >>>>> unfortunately small-minded today's modern audience has become. >>>>> >>>>> Was this film a mess? Absolutely, in every sense of the word. But was >>>>> it >>>>> a >>>>> coherent mess? That's the real question, and I think that I can safely >>>>> say >>>>> that it is. This film is nowhere near as difficult to understand as >>>>> anybody would have you believe. The concepts are straightforward and >>>>> are >>>>> practically dictated to you by the narrator; this becomes essential to >>>>> the >>>>> understanding of the story, as there is just way too much going on to >>>>> take >>>>> in on your own. However, instead of hindering the film, it makes these >>>>> seemingly unrelated scenes string together into a true tapestry that >>>>> is >>>>> worth exploring. >>>>> >>>>> So, you know what? I'm going to go against my own advice and advise >>>>> anybody and everybody who reads this review to go out and see this >>>>> film. >>>>> If you don't like it, don't come back to this website whining about >>>>> it, >>>>> because nobody here has the tolerance to explain things to you that >>>>> you >>>>> will never understand. No amount of discussion of cinematography, >>>>> lighting >>>>> or the fantastically haunting score by Moby is going to change the >>>>> mind >>>>> of >>>>> an already jaded viewer. >>>>> >>>>> But maybe, just maybe, you will like it. You'll get a chance to >>>>> experience >>>>> something you're likely to rarely, if never, experience again. Because >>>>> as >>>>> all of us who enjoyed the film know: >>>>> >>>>> It had to be this way. >>>>> -- >>>>> Honda Civic '00 EK3 1.5 Vtec-E >>>>> >>