> Galutinis choisas:
> gal idomu kam
>
> Procesorius: AMD FX8150, 8 branduoliu, 3,6GHz, 8MB L3 atmintis. 708Lt

> >O kas negerai su tais AMD FX prosiesoriais?
>
> Daug W/silumos/triuksmo:
> http://www.behardware.com/articles/842-12/amd-fx-8150-and-fx-6100-bulldozer-arrives-on-am3.html
> http://www.anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested/9
> Ne per daug gausiai performance:
> http://www.behardware.com/articles/842-23/amd-fx-8150-and-fx-6100-bulldozer-arrives-on-am3.html
> Ne per geriausios ir kainos:
> http://www.skytech.lt/search.php?keywords=AMD+FX+cache
> Nemazai pigiu matkiu "Supports CPU up to 95 W"..
>
> Rimtesne AM3+ matke matyt kainuos ~300 Lt, t.y. +/- ta pati ka ir kokia S1155 Z77..
> FX-8120/8150 540/675 Lt kainuoja kaip ir i5 non-K/K irgi +/- panasiai..

i5K/i7K sakyciau geriau.. matke Z77 irgi palaiko 32GB RAM.. tai...

Plius:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/AMD-FX-8150-vs-Core-i5-2500K-and-Core-i7-2600K-CPU-Review/1402/6
On Photoshop CS4, Intel CPUs were way faster: the Core i7-2600K (3.4 GHz) beat the AMD FX-8150 (3.6 GHz) by 34%, while the Core 
i5-2500K (3.3 GHz) beat it by 30 percent. The AMD FX-8150 was 4% faster than the Phenom II X6 1100T (3.3 GHz) on this....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulldozer_%28microarchitecture%29#Processors

.... FX-8150 performed poorly in benchmarks that were .....behind the second-generation Intel Core i* series processors
and being matched or even outperformed by AMD's own Phenom II X6 at lower clock speeds.

FX-8150 = 4modules/8thread ... neapsicorink apgaulingai tais 8core..

*******

Nuo mac/pc .. issirinkai sakyciau kiek komplikuota susirink-pats nelabai vykusi kompa..
Na ir dar del nVidia nespjauk, jei jau grafika ir Cuda gali praverst.. del zaidimu, tai HD78xx man labiau patinka..