as lyginu panasaus nasumo modelius tikiu kad galima dar ka nors dar silpnesnio parinkt, maziau naudojancio elektros. bet ar dziugins? paleisi visokiu torentu, dlna su transkodingais, cloudu su fotoservisais irgi kamerom ir prades stabdyti. "Tomas D." <mailsoc@gmial.com> wrote in message news:mcnsdj$f2o$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > Nesamone parasei del Synology suvartojimo. > > Imu kaip pavyzdi mano pamineta Synology DS115j: > Power consumption* > 10.52W (Access) > 4.97W (HDD Hibernation) > > * Power consumption is measured when fully loaded with Western Digital 1TB > WD10EFRX hard drive(s). > > Saltinis: https://www.synology.com/en-global/products/DS115j#spec > > Tu ten paminejai tiktai CPU galinguma neskaitant kiek eda pati MB, diskas > ir t.t. > > Zinant, kad full load'as ten bus max 20% viso jo naudojimo laiko, tai > galima suvidurkint ties kokiais 7W. Skirtumas visumoj didziulis. > > > "etikmat" <no@email.com> wrote in message > news:mcnglb$a99$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> tu teisus, synology naudoja taip 2x daugiau elektros uz hp microserver >> gen 8 (i3-4130 TDP 54W vs celeron g1610t TDP 35W), taipogi uz gen7 >> (turion ii neo n54l, TDP 25W) >> >> p.s. xpenology luptas nuo ds3615xc >> >> "Tomas D." <mailsoc@gmial.com> wrote in message >> news:mcliiq$dvk$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> Bet tokiu atveju elektros suvartojimas kokius 2x lyginant su kokiu >>> synology? >>> CPU x86 vs ARM is esmes apie energijos sanaudas si ta sako. >>> >>> "etikmat" <no@email.com> wrote in message >>> news:mckvb2$6ms$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>o jeigu taip? >>>> >>>> http://www.amazon.de/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_1?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=hp+microserver&rh=i%3Aaps%2Ck%3Ahp+microserver >>>> >>>> + >>>> >>>> http://xpenology.com/forum/ >>>> >> > >