jei procas ne restricted instruction - niekas netrukdo siusti jam 
restricted set'us.

vienzo. abalys su maziau ramo, 32 bit aplinkoje dirba greiciau nei 
windoze ant analogisko inteliaus. tiek adobe, tiek esko.


On 14/04/2018 14:36, MRT wrote:
>> kuris ten cyrix'as buvo risc? ir kaip jis tada galėjo būt instruction 
>> set compatible su x86?
> 
> pl.. poveikis baiges.. ziuriu, kad toliau kliedim :D..
> 
> Inteliniai abalio procai yra truly truly non RISC..
> 
> Apie tarsi RISC suprantantis "x86" gal kazkiek:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Atom#Microarchitecture
> 
> Those Atom processors are able to execute up to two instructions per 
> cycle. Like many other x86 microprocessors, they translate 
> x86-instructions (CISC instructions) into simpler internal operations 
> (sometimes referred to as micro-ops, i.e., effectively RISC style 
> instructions) prior to execution. The majority of instructions produce 
> one micro-op when translated, with around 4% of instructions used in 
> typical programs producing multiple micro-ops. The number of 
> instructions that produce more than one micro-op is significantly fewer 
> than the P6 and NetBurst microarchitectures. In the Bonnell <..>
> 
> bet jei OS'as yra x86-instruction set'o.. tai cia grynai proco reikalas 
> issiverst tas instrukcijas i savo makaulei suprantamus micro-ops'us.
> 
>