cia kam kokios features aktualu. Jei man to reiketu, galvociau apie D80. 
Kolkas manau pakaks D60, paskui bus matyt. Gal uzsimanysiu D300.

> Rockwellas aisku jega, bet galima ir taip D40/D60 lygint su D50:
>
> # No lens motor in body means non-AF-S/AF-I lenses are manual focus only
> # No status LCD panel on top of camera
> # No exposure or white balance bracketing
> # No hard buttons for Image Quality, ISO or White Balance
> # No depth-of-field preview
> # Only three AF points (Multi-CAM530)
>
> D50 pralaimi tik ant ekrano dydzio/kokybes, kiti pliusai jo pusej
>
>
>
> .
> "nw" <nw@nw.nw> wrote in message news:goo48f$b4d$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>> labiausiai esu nusiteikes imt nauja, bet palygint galim :)
>>
>>
>> KenRockwell raso:
>> The only thing the D50 has up on the D40 is the ability to use older AF 
>> lenses and possibly a meter better optimized for professional use; 
>> otherwise, I find the D40 superior in having a better screen, much easier 
>> to use, the ability to fine-tune preset white balances and probably a 
>> meter better optimized for non-professionals.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "shilius@work" <shilius@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>> news:goo28g$7eh$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>>> ja ja imk D50 :) Aš galvoju kodėl neparduodu jo, o pasirodo jis tavęs 
>>> laukia :)
>>
>>
>