"student" <student@law.com> Wrote in message: > kiek teiseti tokie teiginiai? ar tavo kalba pasakyta Maximoje priklauso Maximai? realiai delfis yra viesa vieta. Jie patys ispeja kad neatsako uz turini, taciau tuo pat metu prisiima nuosavybe? > > http://www.amerika.org/politics/is-it-logical-to-treat-social-media-sites-as-private-companies/ > > In the past, government has recognized the need for free speech in public spaces even when owned by private entities: > > The requirement that appellants permit appellees to exercise state-protected rights of free expression and petition on shopping center property does not amount to an unconstitutional infringement of appellants¡¦ property rights under the Taking Clause of the Fifth Amendment, appellants having failed to demonstrate that the ¡§right to exclude others¡¨ is so essential to the use or economic value of their property that the state-authorized limitation of it amounted to a ¡§taking.¡¨ > > ¡KThe shopping center, by choice of its owner, is not limited to the personal use of appellants, and the views expressed by members of the public in passing out pamphlets or seeking signatures for a petition thus will not likely be identified with those of the owner. Furthermore, no specific message is dictated by the State to be displayed on appellants¡¦ property, and appellants are free to publicly dissociate themselves from the views of the speakers or handbillers. > Paieskok kas susije su byla delfi as vs estija zmogaus teisiu teisme. Portala pripazino atsakingu uz komentarus -- / ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/