Tai <> "tris kartus pagauna uz kokia smulkmena". Pas juos kaip tik 
liberalesne tvarka - galimybe buti paleistam lygtinai uz rimtesnius 
pazeidimus. Bet atitinkamai rimtesnes sankcijos prisidirbus pakartotinai. 
Todel pirmi du kartai gali buti rimti, bet tu nesesi. Bet jei trecia karta 
numesi nuoruka - gausi uz pirmus du ir daug griezciau. Tuo tarpu pas mus 
lygtinai gauti galima tik uz lengvesnius pazeidimus, bet padares papildoma 
pazeidima paskirta bausme bus tik ankstesniu nusikaltimu ribose.

"u s a u s a"  wrote in message news:nnfakn$294$6@trimpas.omnitel.net...

Take, for example, Leandro Andrade.

His last offense was stealing $153 worth of videotapes from Kmart stores
in San Bernardino, according to Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the law school
at the University of California, Irvine.

Now, Andrade had had his run-ins with the law. He was a drug addict, and
he had committed some residential burglaries years before. So when he
stole those videos, it was a third strike, which could mean 25 years to
life in prison.

But because Andrade grabbed the videos from two different Kmarts, he was
prosecuted for two third strikes. As a result, says Chemerinsky, Andrade
was sentenced to life in prison with no parole for 50 years.

On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:13:49 +0300, Linas Petkevičius wrote:

> Nera taip.
>
> "u s a u s a"  wrote in message news:nnfa3k$294$5@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>
> beje turetu buti toks istatymas kaip Californijoje - 'three strike law'
> -
> tris kartus pagauna uz kokia smulkmena - gauni kokius 20 metu
> atsedeti...