ne, o tu? -- t. "Audrys" <oginiekienoreikalaskokiadeze@takas.lt> wrote in message news:o5bdp4$c8m$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >o tu del to bliauni? > > "tomasz" wrote in message news:o5bdit$c6j$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > > tave tai dziugina? > > -- > > t. > "Audrys" <oginiekienoreikalaskokiadeze@takas.lt> wrote in message > news:o5b8qa$aai$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> a, tai ldk viska prapiso, nes su klumpem I ataka begt sunku >> >> "tomasz" wrote in message news:o5b8h2$a7h$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >> >> jau geriau klumpes negu >> http://ussr-kruto.ru/2012/09/30/284/ >> >> -- >> >> t. >> "Gintas" <nesvarbu@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:o5b76e$9t5$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> Klumpes, anot vieno interneto komentatoriaus, tai: "is malku drozti >>> batai" >>> >>> "Audrys" <oginiekienoreikalaskokiadeze@takas.lt> schrieb im Newsbeitrag >>> news:o5b571$9cc$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>> tik nearogantiskos ismaniosios klumpes pastiptu badu, jei ne tame tarpe >>>> ir >>>> is prancuzu lesu mokama euroismalda. >>>> buvo klumpes durnos ir ubagai - tokie ir liko. >>>> >>>> "tomasz" wrote in message news:o5b4bj$93u$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>> >>>> arogantiskas varliaedis ir tiek. >>>> kaip ir visi kiti prancuzpalaikiai. >>>> buvo tokie tada, liko tokie patys ir dabar. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> t. >>>> "Audrys" <oginiekienoreikalaskokiadeze@takas.lt> wrote in message >>>> news:o5b3k1$8ub$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>> klemanso apie amerikosus pasake: vienintele salis, kuri is barbaru >>>>> perejo >>>>> tiesiai degradavima aplenkdama civilizacijos faze. >>>>> >>>>> https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Georges_Clemenceau >>>>> America is the only nation in history which miraculously has gone >>>>> directly >>>>> from barbarism to degeneration without the usual interval of >>>>> civilization. >>>>> >>>>> "rr" wrote in message news:o5b2ue$8op$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>> >>>>> tau malonu niekinti ir tyciotis is kitos tautos? >>>>> >>>>> Signalizacija wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> - ?? ???? >>>>>> - ? ???????! >>>>>> - ? ?? ?????????, ??? ??, ? ????????? ??? ??? >>>>>> - ??, ???, ??????? ?... >>>>>> - ?????, ? ?? ????????? ??? ?? - ? ????????? ??? ??? ??????, ??????, >>>>>> ??????????, ???????, ????????, ???????, ? ????? ??????! >>>>>> - ??, ??????? ?... >>>>>> - ?? ????, ???? ?????????????? ?????? ?????? ??? ??????????????? >>>>>> ?????????????? ? ???? ??? ? ????? ?? ???, ?? ??????????? ??? ??? >>>>>> ???????????, ???????????????? ?? ? ???? ?? ????????????, ??? >>>>>> ??????????????, ??? ????? ??? ??? ???? ? ???? ???? ???????????????, >>>>>> ??????? ?????? ??? ??????????????!!!. ????? ???? ?????? ? ????? ? >>>>>> ???????, ? ???????? ??? ?????. ?? ??????????, ????? ????? ???????? ? >>>>>> ?????? ????? - ??? ??? ???? ??????? ???????? "????????????? ??", >>>>>> "????????????? ??". ???? ??????????? ? ????? ? ???????. ???? ? ??? ?? >>>>>> ????. ?????? ?????????????? ????????. >>>>> >>>> >> >