O davai papasakok kuo tai skiriasi nuo principo 'ai px, gal nieko neatsitiks': The tsunami countermeasures taken when Fukushima Daiichi was designed and sited in the 1960s were considered acceptable in relation to the scientific knowledge then, with low recorded run-up heights for that particular coastline. But through to the 2011 disaster, new scientific knowledge emerged about the likelihood of a large earthquake and resulting major tsunami of some 15.7 metres at the Daiichi site. However, this had not yet led to any major action by either the plant operator, Tepco, or government regulators, notably the Nuclear & Industrial Safety Agency (NISA). The tsunami countermeasures could also have been reviewed in accordance with IAEA guidelines which required taking into account high tsunami levels, but NISA continued to allow the Fukushima plant to operate without sufficient countermeasures such as sealing the lower part of the buildings and having some back-up for seawater pumps, despite clear warnings. Gali viska paskaityt cia (sorry, ne delfis): http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/safety-and-security/safety-of-plants/fukushima-accident/ "Signalizacija" <signalizacija.master@gmail.com> wrote in message news:lmfkkr$laq$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... > tada iesok pavyzdzio normalaus, nes nesamone parasei > > On 2014.05.30 13:20, Nevkurse wrote: >> Ne apie prieziura, o apie principa 'ai px, gal nieko neatsitiks'. >> >> "Signalizacija" <signalizacija.master@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:lm9jre$q3d$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>> Galejai patylet. Nes tiek cernobylis tiek fukusima sugedo ne del >>> prieziuros nepakankamumo >>> >>> On 2014.05.30 09:06, Nevkurse wrote: >>>> O tai Cernobylis ne del to jobtelejo? :) Fukushima ne del to paties >>>> nuplove? Atsipeikek, toks jausmas kad gyvenime neesi klaidos padares, >>>> neteisingo sprendimo priemes. Pizdielint po fakto visi gudrus ir zino >>>> ka >>>> _reikejo_ daryt pries ivyki. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Dainiushas" <skirdain@soften.ktu.lt> wrote in message >>>> news:lm72md$lsc$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>> pagal tokią logiką, tai ir atominę leketrinę būtų galima eksploatuot >>>>> stilium "ai px, gal nieko neatsitiks"..... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2014.05.29 13:26, 911 wrote: >>>>>> o lengvuskiu nieks niekada nenubyra ir nesuluzta o tuo laboiau tau >>>>>> niekada niekada taip nenutiks? >>>>>> ble rado sensacija... >>>>>> zinok buna zmones ir nuo puseseres triperiu uzsikrecia ;)))) >>>>>> >>>>>> "Dainiushas" <skirdain@soften.ktu.lt> wrote in message >>>>>> news:lm70pi$jp9$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>>>> čia iš serijos, kaip ir niekad nežinai, ar nesprogs restauruota ir >>>>>>> su >>>>>>> degintuvu "pragilinta" padanga? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2014.05.29 13:02, LabaiNespauda wrote: >>>>>>>> Kai tu visa laika rasineji njusuose ir niekada realiai nekrovei tu >>>>>>>> rastu >>>>>>>> ir net nematei, kaip tai vyksta, tai ir negali isivaizduot. >>>>>>>> Cia gali buti soniniu laikikliu poxuizmas. >>>>>>>> Kaip tu atspesi luš ar ne tas metalas, jeigu isoriniu pazeidimu >>>>>>>> nera? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Dainiushas" <skirdain@soften.ktu.lt> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:lm6tfh$h5a$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>>>>>> nu. tai čia forsmažoras, ar pochuizmas? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2014.05.29 12:06, LabaiNespauda wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Nes kazkada galejo buti perpisti kraunant. >>>>>>>>>> Priekaba is fotkiu nesurudijus, todel rudys ir metalo pavargimas >>>>>>>>>> vargiai >>>>>>>>>> bau ar priezastis. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Dainiushas" <skirdain@soften.ktu.lt> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>> news:lm6svq$gnc$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>>>>>>>> o lūžo nes? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2014.05.29 11:52, LabaiNespauda wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> A nematai, kad soniniai laikikliai nx nuluzo? >>>>>>>>>>>> Tai, kai luzta ir isbyra. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Dainiushas" <skirdain@soften.ktu.lt> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>>>> news:lm6q9u$dv0$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... >>>>>>>>>>>>> nu, ir man pirma mintis - techniškai tvarkingas vilkikas, >>>>>>>>>>>>> neviršydamas >>>>>>>>>>>>> greičio, vežė pagal taisykles pakrautą krovinį ir jis nei iš >>>>>>>>>>>>> šio nei >>>>>>>>>>>>> iš to iškrito. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Viskas tai pohui, bet kai pagalvoji kuo galėjo baigtis, tai >>>>>>>>>>>>> eina >>>>>>>>>>>>> nah.... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2014.05.29 11:08, Jonas Vingis wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014-05-29 11:05, Linas Petkevičius rašė: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pradziai issiaiskinti priezastis. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nu tai garantuotai n punktų darbo saugos ir krovinių vežimo >>>>>>>>>>>>>> taisyklių >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pažeidimų. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lietuvoj juk visiems nusišvilpti ant tokių niekų. Vat ir >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dabar >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pas mus >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ainava valo langus. Darbininkai ties trečiu aukštu ant >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pastolių be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> šalmų, neprisisegę... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> pagal >>>> >>