Stai toki komentara radau vienam forume, biski padejo:

My opinion is that I'd get the cheaper ram, the Kingston, unless you're out 
for the very highest of ram timings. The higher CL will not slow you down 
all that much. CL ratings meant a lot back in the days of SIMMs and DIMMs 
and a bit with DDR2, but with DDR3, the effect is less. The Corsair will 
probably let you clock a bit higher and post higher scores on 3DMark06 or 
Vantage, but for everyday use, it won't make any difference except to your 
wallet.

Here's some articles on the price vs performance

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ddr3-2000-6gb,2320-7.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/triple-channel-ddr3-i7,2128-9.html

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/DDR3-1600-PC3-12800-Memory,2013-13.html

While these reviews may not cover the exact ram that you're looking at, they 
give a good idea what to expect. I like the opening sentences in the 
conclusion of the last article

"We didn't see much performance difference between the various DDR3-1600 
module sets, regardless of speed or timings-not even when using an enhanced 
FSB-2000 to the processor. If we assume that benchmarks are only consistent 
to plus or minus 0.5%, we could simply state that when it comes to DDR3 
memory, the cheaper the better."

So its my opinion, but get the cheapest name brand ram that you see and be 
content that it will do all you need, unless you're into overclocking to the 
max and trying to set very high performance scores.


> Atrodo labiau vertetu imti daugiau ram arba greitesni ram, jei kitokiu 
> ideju nebus tai turbut idesiu 6 GB, bet neturiu menkiausio supratimo kiek 
> itakos mano atveju tures 1333Mhz pries 1600Mhz pav, na ir Corsair pries 
> Kingston.