nu cia gi seagate reklamine medziaga - reikia kazkuo argumentuotai paaiskinti kodel tas pats hdd su SAS juntamai brangesnis nei su SATA. O jei paziureti realiaus naudojimo benchmarkus - deti I namu pc SAS 7200rpm diska jokios prasmes - to pacio modelio sata versija jame suksis greiciau. vat jei tam namu pc butu bent 2hdd, kur butu pastoviai droziami - tada sas apsimoka. Ir kartais labai stipriai apsimoka. "MRT" parašė naujienų news:jlhal2$qvv$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... O jei paziuret 20-aji psl?: http://www.snia.org/sites/default/education/tutorials/2007/fall/storage/WillisWhittington_Deltas_by_Design.pdf Pagal wiki: They feature the following benefits compared to SATA:[3] * Dual ports allowing redundant paths * Multiple host support * Full SCSI command set * Faster interface compared to SATA, up to 30%, no STP (Serial ATA Tunneling Protocol) overhead * No need for SATA interposer cards (for high availability of SATA drives SATA interposer cards are needed) To summarize: Nearline SAS drives are simply big, cheap, and slow SAS drives targeted toward nearline storage.