On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:30:23 +0200, mindis wrote:

> nu jei signalo pokycius elektrinese grandinese vadini procesinimu, tai
> taip, procesinami. O del jpeg apdorojimo tai labai priklauso nuo kameros

Tikintiems - dangus :)

http://www.leica-boss.com/2013/10/sony-alpha-a7-example-raw-files-in-
depth/

The reality is that RAW files are always processed in-camera. You have 
better options than the camera company thinks your files should look. In 
Sony’s case – they use some SERIOUS noise reduction (detail-killing 
smearing) and other band-aid processing of images that makes things look 
like cell phone camera photos at the pixel level. 

Jei ka, somy nera vienintele firma uzsiimanti RAW'u pimpinimu kameroje. 
Tam jie ir deda visus tuos bionz chipsus.

> nustatymu, ir kuom rimtesne kamera tuo juo daugiau. nemanau kad tu su
> svetima kamera turejai pakankamai laiko ja iki pakankamo lygio ivaldyt.
> O ir raw apdorojimo softa dar reikia moket naudot.

Padorioje kameroje geri rezultatai turi gautis out of the box. Su 
galimybe patiuninimo pagal savo skoni. Gi ne koks kinietiskas 
konstruktorius.

> zinai, kazkaip as labiau dpreview testais labiau tikiu nei taviskiais
> improvizuotasi megejiskais testais.

Ant sveikatos :)

-- 
kthxbai.