>baikit svaigti
>http://reviews.cnet.com/green-tech/tv-power-efficiency/

1. Pamiršti, kad amerikonai plazmas jei perka tai ima 55/59-65" dydžio. 
Jiems 50", kaip mums 42" TV ...
1.1. JAV 120 V, Europje 220V.

Štai kiek ima ES rinkai skirtas 65VT30 ir 64D8000 (anot AVforums.co.uk):
Clearly anyone who buys a 65" plasma is probably not going to be that 
concerned about the display's energy consumption but Panasonic however do 
place a great deal of importance in the energy efficiency of their 2011 
models. Since a plasma uses a self-illuminating technology this means the 
power consumption varies with the content shown on screen, the brighter the 
content the greater the amount of power used. The energy consumption was 
tested using 0, 50 and 100 IRE static windows in the calibrated picture mode 
and we measured 65 watts, 100 watts and 200 watts respectively. When viewing 
normal material in a calibrated mode the power consumption averaged 300 
watts but this was on the full screen as opposed to an IRE window. Obviously 
in 3D mode the screen is brighter which will result in greater energy 
consumption but considering its size the P65VT30 is actually as energy 
efficient as Panasonic claim".

"Given the size of the screen it should come as no surprise to discover the 
PS64D8000 is not particularly energy efficient and due to the 
self-illuminating nature of the technology the power usage varies depending 
on the content being shown on the screen. The consumption figures in Movie 
Mode using 0, 50 and 100 IRE windows were 173 watts, 190 watts and 237 watts 
with an average of 300 watts for actual full screen material. The Panasonic 
P65VT30 produced much better results in these tests so from an energy 
consumption perspective the VT30 was the clear winner."

Tai gi 300 W tau naudos tik 64-65" plazma. Ar tokio dydžio planuoji pirkti?