Jei iseina, pasitvarkyk "l1pc02 (unknown [10.18.x.y])" reversa. Gal pades. Siaip tai reiketu su header_checks filtruoti... ziuras wrote: > Sveiki, > Pirma karta gavau toki atsakyma, nezinau ka daryti. > fructus.s-it.lt sako kad nepriima laisko siusto is l1pc02 kompo. > Bet l1pc02 yra vidinis kompas (l1pc02.domain.local). > Issiusta per mail.domen.lt, su kuriuo lygtais viskas tvarkoje? > > Viduje naudoti isorinius vardus (l1pc02.dome.lt)? - nemanau kad tai gera > ideja. > Sakyti postfixui kad sleptu is kokiu vidiniu pc gavo laiskus > (l1pc02.domen.local)? - nezinau kaip tai padaryti. > O gal cia fructus.s-it.lt persistenge? > > Busiu dekingas uz situacijos isaiskinima. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Content-filter at fructus.s-it.lt" <postmaster@fructus.s-it.lt> > To: <audrius@domen.lt> > Sent: 2008 m. rugpjucio 29 d. 12:25 > Subject: Considered UNSOLICITED BULK EMAIL, apparently from you > > >> A message from <audrius@domen.lt> to: >> -> robertas@edija.lt >> >> was considered unsolicited bulk e-mail (UBE). >> >> Our internal reference code for your message is 40941-18/CMeDNJ3KhisE >> >> The message carried your return address, so it was either a genuine mail >> from you, or a sender address was faked and your e-mail address abused >> by third party, in which case we apologize for undesired notification. >> >> We do try to minimize backscatter for more prominent cases of UBE and >> for infected mail, but for less obvious cases of UBE some balance >> between losing genuine mail and sending undesired backscatter is sought, >> and there can be some collateral damage on both sides. >> >> According to a 'Received:' trace, the message originated at: [195.22.x.y], >> l1pc02 (unknown [10.18.x.y]) >> >> Return-Path: <audrius@domen.lt> >> Message-ID: <001501c909b9$2b757ed0$e09d120a@domen.local> >> Subject: xxx >> >> Delivery of the email was stopped! >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> Return-Path: <audrius@domen.lt> >> Received: from mail.domen.lt (kmp.domen.lt [195.22.x.y]) >> by fructus.s-it.lt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D75A116F >> for <robertas@edija.lt>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:25:31 +0300 (EEST) >> Received: from mail.domen.lt (localhost [127.0.0.1]) >> by mail.domen.lt (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19EB1F16FA >> for <robertas@edija.lt>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:25:29 +0300 (EEST) >> Received: by mail.domen.lt (Postfix, from userid 8) >> id E41711F16FC; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:25:29 +0300 (EEST) >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on mail.domen.lt >> X-Spam-Level: >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, >> MIME_BASE64_TEXT,TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=no version=3.2.3 >> Received: from l1pc02 (unknown [10.18.x.y]) >> by mail.domen.lt (Postfix) with SMTP id E5E821F16FA >> for <robertas@edija.lt>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:25:25 +0300 (EEST) >> Message-ID: <001501c909b9$2b757ed0$e09d120a@domen.local> >> Reply-To: "Audrius" <audrius@domen.lt> >> From: "Audrius" <audrius@domen.lt> >> To: "Robertas Vicys" <robertas@edija.lt> >> Subject: xxx >> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:25:25 +0300 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; >> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01C909D2.50849C60" >> X-Priority: 3 >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 >> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP >> > >