Kalbant, kad lyginu 46" LED vs 50" plazma, ir Samsung LED vs Panasonic plazma, tai tu suklydai.

"Dainiushas"  wrote in message news:iff3g5$umo$1@trimpas.omnitel.net... 

nekalbant, kad lygini skirtingus dydžius,

Samsung PS50C550 deklaruota 180W, UE55C8000 150W


On 12/29/2010 12:38 PM, zZz wrote:
> http://panasonic.net/avc/viera/eu2010/product/vt20_plasma_spec.html
>      Rated Power Consumption
>      TX-P65VT20E : 635 W, TX-P50VT20E : 425 W, TX-P46VT20E : TBD, TX-P42VT20E : TBD
>
>      On mode Average Power Consumption (IEC 62087 Ed.2)
>      TX-P65VT20E : TBD, TX-P50VT20E : 212 W, TX-P46VT20E : TBD, TX-P42VT20E : TBD
>
> -->  lyginau: kažkur google TX teste radau 250 W (deja, linko nepamenu)
>
> http://www.samsung.com/lt/consumer/tv-audio-video/televisions/led-tv/UE46C9000ZWXBT/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=specification
>
>      Elektros sąnaudos (IEC 62087 Ed.2) : 160 W
>
> http://www.samsung.com/lt/consumer/tv-audio-video/televisions/led-tv/UE46C5000QWXBT/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=specification
>      Elektros sąnaudos (IEC 62087 Ed.2) : 105 W
>
> -->  lyginau: UE46C5000QWXBT (105 W)
> -->  total: 250 / 105 = ~2.5x
>
>
> "Dainiushas"  wrote in message news:ifeus4$nni$3@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>
> galima nuorodas į šaltinius apie 2.5x elektros?
>
>
> On 12/29/2010 09:52 AM, zZz wrote:
>> Dėl išdegimo galėtų kas nors pakomentuot.
>> El