Kai lygini nepamirsk palygint ir to fakto, kad LCD jams visa laika 
vienodai, plazma gi ne.
Panasius 42'V10 max 230 W

On 12/29/2010 12:49 PM, zZz wrote:
> Kalbant, kad lyginu 46" LED vs 50" plazma, ir Samsung LED vs Panasonic plazma, tai tu suklydai.
>
> "Dainiushas"  wrote in message news:iff3g5$umo$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>
> nekalbant, kad lygini skirtingus dydžius,
>
> Samsung PS50C550 deklaruota 180W, UE55C8000 150W
>
>
> On 12/29/2010 12:38 PM, zZz wrote:
>> http://panasonic.net/avc/viera/eu2010/product/vt20_plasma_spec.html
>>       Rated Power Consumption
>>       TX-P65VT20E : 635 W, TX-P50VT20E : 425 W, TX-P46VT20E : TBD, TX-P42VT20E : TBD
>>
>>       On mode Average Power Consumption (IEC 62087 Ed.2)
>>       TX-P65VT20E : TBD, TX-P50VT20E : 212 W, TX-P46VT20E : TBD, TX-P42VT20E : TBD
>>
>> -->   lyginau: kažkur google TX teste radau 250 W (deja, linko nepamenu)
>>
>> http://www.samsung.com/lt/consumer/tv-audio-video/televisions/led-tv/UE46C9000ZWXBT/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=specification
>>
>>       Elektros sąnaudos (IEC 62087 Ed.2) : 160 W
>>
>> http://www.samsung.com/lt/consumer/tv-audio-video/televisions/led-tv/UE46C5000QWXBT/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=specification
>>       Elektros sąnaudos (IEC 62087 Ed.2) : 105 W
>>
>> -->   lyginau: UE46C5000QWXBT (105 W)
>> -->   total: 250 / 105 = ~2.5x
>>
>>
>> "Dainiushas"  wrote in message news:ifeus4$nni$3@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>>
>> galima nuorodas į šaltinius apie 2.5x elektros?
>>
>>
>> On 12/29/2010 09:52 AM, zZz wrote:
>>> Dėl išdegimo galėtų kas nors pakomentuot.
>>> El