> Cia kaip kam.. man sueidavo net celeron'ai, galima saipytis, > bet realiai dar paziureciau kas kuri lyginant su Core M fanless. fak .. vienas linkas taip ir liko neidetas: http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305CA-EHM1-Subnotebook-Review.154422.0.html Processor On paper, the m3 chip offers performance on par with previous-generation i3 CPUs (for example the Core i3-5010), which have a much higher TDP of 15 watts, but of course lack the extensive Turbo-Boost capabilities. In a passively-cooled notebook, actual performance depends on the implementation - and it turns out that the UX305CA can't keep what the m3-6Y30 promises: even very short load cycles resulted in a - sometimes very noticeable - reduction of the CPU performance. During the X264 video-encoding benchmark test, for example, the subnotebook showed a clear drop in the frame rate during the four iterations (pass 1, #1: 76.5 fps; pass 1, #4: 67.2 fps). The same CPU in the Microsoft Surface Pro 4 is capable of far better performance: while we recorded 1.79 points (multi) and 0.81 points (single) for the Cinebench R11.5 benchmark test, the Surface Pro 4 scored roughly 25 % higher (2.27 / 0.98 points). Stress Test With Prime95 active and the CPU pegged at nearly 100 % utilization, we saw an immediate rise in the CPU temperature from 34 degrees at idle to 68 degrees and then 70 degrees. The CPU core frequency dropped from the maximum of 2 GHz (both cores) to 1.8 and 1.7 GHz during the same time frame. Three additional minutes into the test, the temperate had decreased to 62 degrees with the CPU now fluctuating between 1.4 and 1.5 GHz; another 2 minutes later the temperature dropped to about 55 degrees with the CPU now only maintaining about 1.1 - 1.2 GHz. GPU stress with Furmark showed a similar picture <..> PS. Jei kazkas atrodys per daug negatyviai, tai tarkim viena karta senesniu pora i darba pirkomes komandiruotems.. kolege sau eme.. PSS. bent senesnieji ZIAURIAI peckiojasi.. cia bug'as by design, nes ASUS ikomplektavo skudura :D