Tema: Re: Asus ux305ca ir Core M gerai ar nelabai?
Autorius: bat0nas
Data: 2016-09-07 09:51:27
Šitas gal nelabai.
Touchscreen nėra poreikio. Vartotoja turi planšetę ir visus variantus su 
nuimamu, apverčiamu ar liečiamu ekranu - atmetė.





On 2016.09.07 09:34, Diamondas wrote:
> Tikrai neziurek i grozi - va nupirkau toki
> http://www.computershopper.com/laptops/reviews/hp-pavilion-x360
> Reikalavimai irgi buvo paprasti - grazus, mazas ir raudonas butu faina :)
> Realiai veikia kaip ir jau tuoj bus du metai - tik va islindo vienas rimtas
> bug'as batareika sh mala, tai veikia tai neveikia, tai ji yra tai tipo
> failed nesikrauna :( O batareika ten viduj ir nieks siaip atskiros
> neparduoda - reik uzsakinet, kainuoja gerai :( Teks prisiruost kartu ir
> daryt upgreida diska i ssd jei jau ardyti, kazkaip tenkina tai kas yra nes
> baisiai smarkiai nedirbama - biski ofisas, internetas, skype tai kaip ir per
> akis to kas yra. Bet kai paziuri kaip pasikrauna kaip vartos letai, o ardyt
> vistiek teks ta batarke uzsakius is hp atstovu kazkokiu lt, nes niekas kitas
> deja pasiulyt negali :(
>
> Taip, kad paziurek ir i praktiska puse ziurint keliu metu perspektyva, kad
> nebutu po poros metu dziaugsmu :)
>
>
> "bat0nas" <bat0nas.ok@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:nqo6ud$37p$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
>> Ziauriai dekui.
>> Tokio mazdaug atsakymo ir reikejo. Panasu, kad sitie kompiuteriai tik
>> atrodo graziai.
>>
>> Pakelsime kartele iki i3-i5 ir kimbam narsyti is naujo.
>>
>> Dekui uz rekomendacijas. Pasiskaitysim.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2016.09.06 23:18, MRT wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cia kaip kam.. man sueidavo net celeron'ai, galima saipytis,
>>>> bet realiai dar paziureciau kas kuri lyginant su Core M fanless.
>>>
>>> fak .. vienas linkas taip ir liko neidetas:
>>>
>>> http://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-Zenbook-UX305CA-EHM1-Subnotebook-Review.154422.0.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Processor
>>>
>>> On paper, the m3 chip offers performance on par with previous-generation
>>> i3 CPUs (for example the Core i3-5010), which have a much higher TDP of
>>> 15 watts, but of course lack the extensive Turbo-Boost capabilities. In
>>> a passively-cooled notebook, actual performance depends on the
>>> implementation - and it turns out that the UX305CA can't keep what the
>>> m3-6Y30 promises: even very short load cycles resulted in a - sometimes
>>> very noticeable - reduction of the CPU performance. During the X264
>>> video-encoding benchmark test, for example, the subnotebook showed a
>>> clear drop in the frame rate during the four iterations (pass 1, #1:
>>> 76.5 fps; pass 1, #4: 67.2 fps). The same CPU in the Microsoft Surface
>>> Pro 4 is capable of far better performance: while we recorded 1.79
>>> points (multi) and 0.81 points (single) for the Cinebench R11.5
>>> benchmark test, the Surface Pro 4 scored roughly 25 % higher (2.27 /
>>> 0.98 points).
>>>
>>> Stress Test
>>>
>>> With Prime95 active and the CPU pegged at nearly 100 % utilization, we
>>> saw an immediate rise in the CPU temperature from 34 degrees at idle to
>>> 68 degrees and then 70 degrees. The CPU core frequency dropped from the
>>> maximum of 2 GHz (both cores) to 1.8 and 1.7 GHz during the same time
>>> frame. Three additional minutes into the test, the temperate had
>>> decreased to 62 degrees with the CPU now fluctuating between 1.4 and 1.5
>>> GHz; another 2 minutes later the temperature dropped to about 55 degrees
>>> with the CPU now only maintaining about 1.1 - 1.2 GHz. GPU stress with
>>> Furmark showed a similar picture <..>
>>>
>>> PS. Jei kazkas atrodys per daug negatyviai, tai tarkim viena karta
>>> senesniu pora i darba pirkomes komandiruotems.. kolege sau eme..
>>>
>>> PSS. bent senesnieji ZIAURIAI peckiojasi..
>>> cia bug'as by design, nes ASUS ikomplektavo skudura :D
>>>
>>
>
>