Gal "dominuojantis kinas"? 
http://www.mediadesklithuania.eu/images/zodynas/m.pdf

"Viktorija" <4viktorija@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:h01be7$9l4$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
> Kaip lietuviskai butu "mainstream". Pagal prasme tai turetu buti vienas 
> zodis, daiktavardis, nusakantis sroves pavadinima. Taip kaip 
> siurrealizmas, taip ir "meinstrymas". Ar yra koks kitas zodis?
>
> populiari tendencija netinka, tam yra zodis "popular"
> masine kultura (kryptis) netinka, nes yra zodis "mass" culture/attitude
> siuolaikine irgi netinka, nes yra contemporary
>
> is vis, pagal mane turetu buti ne budvardis (populiari/masine/labiausiai 
> paplitusi/etc) o kazkoks daiktavardis, sroves/tendencijos pavadinimas
>
> zemiau sakiniai su "mainstream"
>
>
> In the surrealist response to Hollywood, genre films were of particular 
> significance because they could elude production codes that dominated the 
> mainstream, but paradoxically it was the demise of the studio production 
> line that put an end to the possibilities of the sort of cinema that would 
> cast up these rich poetic possibilities in a whole range of different 
> films.
>
> With the demise of the B movie, genre films were integrated into the 
> mainstream, something which, along with a greater awareness of 
> inter-textual elements in films among critics and increasingly among film 
> makers as well, has combined to make the involuntary generation of poetry 
> unlikely if not impossible.