Tema: POLEMIKA. Atvirumas istorijai ir Niurnbergo sindromas arbaKodėl valstybės kūryba – ne visada vykusi?
Autorius: patvoristas
Data: 2011-10-14 20:03:49

nebūtinai. Jei laikysimės Putino scenarijaus. Nepo laikai baigėsi.
Naujausiais duomenimis Putinas yra paruošęs naują Eurazijos planą.
Pasirodo jis rimtai konfrontioja prieš vienpolį pasaulį, prieš
Naująją Pasaulio Tvarką. Bet gal tai ir yra NPT dalis tas jo Eurazijinis
planas kuriuo jis nori susigražinti postsovietinę erdvę. :::::: žr.
globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27015 ....'::::::::::::It helps
to understand why, at the moment, Cold War-style headlines are constantly
popping up in Western media and what perceived threat the West discerned in
Putin's recent Eurasian integration. The obvious explanation is that, if
implemented, the plan would come as a geopolitical challenge to the new
world order, to the dominance of NATO, the IMF, the EU and other
supranational bodies, and to the undisguised US primacy. Today's
increasingly assertive Russia suggests and is ready to start building an
inclusive alliance based on principles providing a viable alternative to
Atlantism and neoliberalism. It is an open secret that these days the West
is putting into practice an array of far-reaching geopolitical projects,
reconfiguring Europe in the wake of the Balkan conflicts and against the
backdrop of the crises provoked in Greece and Cyprus, assembling the
Greater Middle East based on serial regime changes across the Arab world,
and, as a relatively novel design, implementing the Asia project in which
the recent disaster in Japan was an active phase.

In 2011, the intensity of geopolitical dynamics was unprecedented since
the collapse of the USSR and the Eastern Bloc, with all major countries and
international bodies contributing. Moreover, the current impression is that
military might somehow became a legitimate instrument in international
politics. Just days ago, Moscow drew avalanche criticism after vetoing the
UN Security Council resolution which could authorize a replay of the Libyan
scenario in Syria. As  a result, US permanent envoy to the UN S. Rice
slammed Russia and China over the veto, while French foreign minister Alain
Juppé declared that “it is a sad day for the Syrian people. It is a sad
day for the Security Council”. During the heated UN security Council
debates on September 5, Syrian representative lambasted Germany and France,
and charged the US with perpetrating genocide in the Middle East. After
that, S. Rice accused Russia and China of hoping to sell arms to the Syrian
regime instead of standing by the Syrian people and stormed out of the
meeting, and French envoy Gérard Araud opined that “No veto can clear of
their responsibility these Syrian authorities that have lost any legitimacy
by murdering its own people”, leaving an impression that murdering
people, as in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, should be a NATO
privilege.................ir t.t. ir t.t. 




-- 
Komentuoju straipsnį http://www.culture.lt/lmenas/?st_id=18663