On Wed, 6 May 2009 11:25:24 +0300, Dzandzeris wrote:

> kazkaip is konteksto nelabai aiskiai zmogui tai gali nuskambeti ... nes lyg 
> ir eina kalba apie tai kad zalgisris yra, buvo, pasieke ... o cia, mano 
> kukliomis anglu kalbos ziniomis tai mano minetoji fraze kalba apie ateiti 
> ... nei sis, nei tas arba kazko nesupratau

Kalbant apie praeitį, tai priimtinas naudojimas. "After establishment in 
1944, Žalgiris would become Soviet champions five times" - maždaug  tas 
pats, kas "... went on to become Soviet champions five times" ... na arba 
"... became Soviet champions five times". T.y., su "would" šnekama apie 
ateitį - bet lyginant su pradiniu tašku, įsteigimo metais (1944). "After 
Stalingrad, it became totally clear who the winners would be".

Yra ir daugiau niuansų. Pvz., "would" gali būti naudojamas naudojamas, 
kalbant apie praeities įvykius, kurie kartodavosi (panaši reikšmė į "used 
to").

"Each morning, we'd meet at the railway station. Back in those times, he'd 
always wear that funny red cap. After having a few beers, we'd then go 
fishing".