<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1257"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3640" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I RAW verta tik tuomeet, jei kadro laukia komercija arba menas. Bet vestuves nesiskaito, tas tik i jpg.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV>"Gie" <<A href="mailto:sabonas@gmail.com">sabonas@gmail.com</A>> wrote in message <A href="news:hhlsf2$gva$1@trimpas.omnitel.net">news:hhlsf2$gva$1@trimpas.omnitel.net</A>...</DIV> <DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>klausimas: ar verta fotkinti visk raw, o poto su ant kompo perleist per koki nors automatizuot program. Ar kompas padarys k geriau negu fotikas? </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>p.s. fotikas canon SD300, pagamintas 2004-09, pirkau vakar u juokingus 80lt, todl visai domu ar galima i jo dar k ispaust.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>