manau, kad nedideja arba dideja juokingai.

pirma paieska internete -

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports that 
extra fuel consumed with the use of DRLs is “a fraction of a mile per 
gallon,” while the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety cites a range 
of $3 to more than $40 per year in extra fuel cost (a consolidation of 
costs reported by GM and Transport Canada). The Institute for Road 
Safety Research of Netherlands (SWOV) reports 0.9 percent additional 
fuel use for DRLs based on European programs that have been in effect 
for several years. A Swedish study completed in 2002 estimated a fuel 
economy penalty range of 0.5 to 1.5 percent for various approaches among 
member nations of the European Union in implementing DRL programs. A 
recent study in Switzerland under “real world” Swiss driving conditions 
in European design gasoline passenger cars indicated about 0.8 percent 
fuel use when adjusting reported results to DRL use conditions.

tai 8% biski jau "actas ir skalunai"


On 2015-09-08 09:47, vaidas100 wrote:
> Dėl 8% - ne pats skaičiavau - gal kažkiek padramatizuotas skaičius.
> Turi kitokius skaičiavimus?
> Ar galvoji, kad kuro sąnaudos nedidėja?
>
> Dėl avaringumo remiuosi TIK savo patirtimi - mane apakina.
>
>
>
> On 2015.09.08 09:30, Zhegonskas wrote:
>> tu realiai tiki tuo, ka rasai?
>>
>> On 2015-09-08 09:19, vaidas100 wrote:
>>> Argumentai kodėl reikia panaikinti važinėjimą dieną su šviesomis:
>>>
>>> 1. Ekologija:
>>>   Daugiau kuro valgo automobilis
>>>   (~8% su kaitrinėmis lemputėmis)
>>>
>>> 2. Didesnis avaringumas:
>>>   Apakinami vairuotojai.
>>>   Nežinau kaip kitiems,
>>>   bet bent jau man tai tikrai prieblandoje trukdo žibintų šviesos... :/
>>>   Kai labiau tamsu kažkaip pavyksta nežiūrėti tiesiai į žibintus...
>>
>