px tie procentai. naudociau nors ir +50% butu jei tik is tikro prisidetu 
prie saugumo kelyje, deja yra atvirksciai.

On 09/08/2015 10:00 AM, Zhegonskas wrote:
> manau, kad nedideja arba dideja juokingai.
>
> pirma paieska internete -
>
> The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reports that
> extra fuel consumed with the use of DRLs is “a fraction of a mile per
> gallon,” while the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety cites a range
> of $3 to more than $40 per year in extra fuel cost (a consolidation of
> costs reported by GM and Transport Canada). The Institute for Road
> Safety Research of Netherlands (SWOV) reports 0.9 percent additional
> fuel use for DRLs based on European programs that have been in effect
> for several years. A Swedish study completed in 2002 estimated a fuel
> economy penalty range of 0.5 to 1.5 percent for various approaches among
> member nations of the European Union in implementing DRL programs. A
> recent study in Switzerland under “real world” Swiss driving conditions
> in European design gasoline passenger cars indicated about 0.8 percent
> fuel use when adjusting reported results to DRL use conditions.
>
> tai 8% biski jau "actas ir skalunai"
>
>
> On 2015-09-08 09:47, vaidas100 wrote:
>> Dėl 8% - ne pats skaičiavau - gal kažkiek padramatizuotas skaičius.
>> Turi kitokius skaičiavimus?
>> Ar galvoji, kad kuro sąnaudos nedidėja?
>>
>> Dėl avaringumo remiuosi TIK savo patirtimi - mane apakina.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015.09.08 09:30, Zhegonskas wrote:
>>> tu realiai tiki tuo, ka rasai?
>>>
>>> On 2015-09-08 09:19, vaidas100 wrote:
>>>> Argumentai kodėl reikia panaikinti važinėjimą dieną su šviesomis:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Ekologija:
>>>>   Daugiau kuro valgo automobilis
>>>>   (~8% su kaitrinėmis lemputėmis)
>>>>
>>>> 2. Didesnis avaringumas:
>>>>   Apakinami vairuotojai.
>>>>   Nežinau kaip kitiems,
>>>>   bet bent jau man tai tikrai prieblandoje trukdo žibintų šviesos... :/
>>>>   Kai labiau tamsu kažkaip pavyksta nežiūrėti tiesiai į žibintus...
>>>
>>
>