net londone to nera.
cia gali tokio vt ir nesulaukt.


dristu teigti priesingai
Energy efficiency[edit]

Internal combustion engines have thermodynamic limits on efficiency, 
expressed as fraction of energy used to propel the vehicle compared to 
energy produced by burning fuel. Gasoline engines effectively use only 15% 
of the fuel energy content to move the vehicle or to power accessories, and 
diesel engines can reach on-board efficiency of 20%, while electric vehicles 
have on-board efficiency of around 80%.[79]

Electric motors are more efficient than internal combustion engines in 
converting stored energy into driving a vehicle. Electric cars do not idle. 
Regenerative braking can recover as much as one fifth of the energy normally 
lost during braking.[4][79]

Production and conversion electric cars typically use 10 to 23 kW·h/100 km 
(0.17 to 0.37 kW·h/mi).[80][81] Approximately 20% of this power consumption 
is due to inefficiencies in charging the batteries. Tesla Motors indicates 
that the vehicle efficiency (including charging inefficiencies) of their 
lithium-ion battery powered vehicle is 12.7 kW·h/100 km (0.21 kW·h/mi) and 
the well-to-wheels efficiency (assuming the electricity is generated from 
natural gas) is 24.4 kW·h/100 km (0.39 kW·h/mi).[82]


-- 

t.
"CodeC" <c@c.c> wrote in message news:ouvj4j$h36$1@trimpas.omnitel.net...
> On 2017.11.20 23:51, tomasz wrote:
>> vaziuosi truliku? kol nebrangios lybros bus, b1b1.
>> nejuokink.
>> kad ir koks butu vt, bet jis veikia tik prievartos principu, t.y. kol 
>> kastai
>> parkavimui ir kamsciai nebus tokie kaip londone, ner ko svaigt. zmogui 
>> turi
>> apsimoket vaziuot su vt.
>
> atsakau nuosirdziai - jeigu tie trulai butu isvystyti tiek, kad prie namu 
> ilipes, prie darbo islipciau po max pusvalandzio, jeigu nereiktu laukti 
> bbz kiek, jeigu persedimui bent jau dienos metu nereiktu planuotis 
> marsruto is anksto, tiesiog dazniau vaziuotu, jeigu jie nestovetu 
> bendruose kamsciuose - tikrai naudociau. vaikai naudotu.
> vaikai ir dviraciu patys iki mokyklos nuvaziuotu, jei butu takas normalus. 
> kaip minimum seimoj uztektu vieno auto. dabar du yra gyvybiskai butini, 
> nes dvirtakiu ner, o VT tik teoriniam lygyje. kai reikia kazkur nuvaziuot, 
> tai trunka dvi valandas, vaziuoja ne pagal grafika, kuris yra ganetinai 
> retas. todel praktiskai panaudojamas tik niekur neskubantiems arba kaip 
> atsarginis variantas, kai gali paveluot.
>
>>
>> dviraciu takai aisku gerai, bet deja tik savitgaliu nuvaziuot iki rotuse 
>> ir
>> isgert pora alaus tinkami, o darbo diena vaiku i darzeli nenuvesi.
>> be to fiziskai ireng dviracio taka ne visur galima, reik dziaugtis, kad 
>> nors
>> bordiurus nuleistus nuvaziavimui padaro ir zalias juostas papiso, nes iki 
>> to
>> tai....
>>
>> o del ev, tai bet kuriuo atveju, tai yra efektyvesne transporto priemone,
>> negu vidausdegimo variklis.
>
> dristu teigti, kad ne.
>
>>
>>
>